In "A Spiking Independent Accumulator Model for Winner-Take-All Computation " by @jgosmann et al. two models of WTA memory are presented: LCA and IA. Are both of these models are implemented in nengo-spa 0.3? Is the LCA model equivalent to the base WTA memory? What’s the relation between the nengo-spa WTA memory and the one In core Nengo 2.5 implemented by the AssociativeMemory module.
I ask, because I’m 80% sure (from looking at the code) the answer to these questions is that LCA == nengo-spa WTA == nengo core Associative Memory, but I’d like to be sure before I cite the publication instead of spending a paragraph explaining how the WTA memory works.
I’m also sure I’ve asked this to @jgosmann at least twice, but I can’t seem to remember the answer, so I’m asking it in a public place so it’s easier to find.